法学研究

文章摘要

“债权物权化”之范畴厘定

Determination of the Category of “Die Verdinglichung obligatorischer Rechte”

DOI：

英文关键词: Die Verdinglichung obligatorischer Rechte; obligation-real dichotomy system; Die Versachlichung obligatorischer Rechte; Die Verdinglichung der Obligation; disposal protection

基金项目:

作者	单位
袁野

摘要点击次数: 1484

全文下载次数: 98

中文摘要:

“债权物权化”由来已久，但其内在机理却鲜有深究。“债权物权化”现象域呈现出随意、散漫的泛化之势，此种“合并异类项”的发展趋势极易消解债物二分体系和债权物权区分理论。基于对德国学说的继受和发展，“债权物权化”系指债权具有部分物权特征。“债权物权化”与“债权物化”存在根本差异，后者对应债权的财产权客体面相，此时“物化”的债权具有全部物权特征。以继受保护不构成债权物权区分的特征为限，尤应注意“债权物权化”与“债之随物化”之间的区辨。在重构物权特征的基础上，“债权物权化”仅涉及相对性面相下的合同债权被赋予对标的物权的处分保护。“物权化”构成法政策介入私法的媒介，受比例原则制约，在方法上宜谨慎运用。

英文摘要:

The category of "Die Verdinglichung obligatorischer Rechte" (the reification of obligatory rights) has been used in China for a long time, but its internal mechanism has rarely been investigated. The phenomena of "Die Verdinglichung obligatorischer Rechte" present a tendency of random and loose generalization, and the development of the "merger of heterogeneous items" can easily dissolve the obligation-real dichotomy system and the theory of the difference between real rights and obligatory rights. Based on the inheritance and development of the theory from Germany, "Die Verdinglichung obligatorischer Rechte" means that obligatory rights have partial effects of real rights. There is a fundamental difference between "Die Verdinglichung obligatorischer Rechte" and "Die Versachlichung obligatorischer Rechte" (the objectification of obligatory rights). The latter corresponds to the phenomenon that the obligatory right becomes the object of the property right and has all the characteristics of the real right. In terms of the characteristic of succession protection does not constitute the distinction between obligatory rights and real rights, special attention should be paid to the distinction between "Die Verdinglichung obligatorischer Rechte" and "Die Verdinglichung der Obligation". On the basis of reconstructing the nature of real rights, "Die Verdinglichung obligatorischer Rechte" only involves the contractual obligatory right in the aspect of relativity, which is given the disposal protection of the target real right. "Verdinglichung" constitutes a medium for the legal policy to intervene in the private law, which is restricted by the principle of proportionality and should be used carefully in terms of its method.

查看全文下载PDF阅读器

关闭